Typically, the records where I’m in the producer’s chair are recorded live, with all the musicians close enough together that they could reach out and touch one another. I do this because it ignites a special kind of energy when the band is all playing together. It also means that all the tracks bleed on one another.
There’s a fear in the recording community of track bleed. People can be meticulous about making sure all the instruments are isolated, so they don’t bleed on one another. They’re afraid that all this bleed will degrade the sound of the record, or lock them into a position that keeps them from having options later.
I love bleed. I think track bleed actually enhances the sound, as to me it’s all about what happens when the parts come together, not really the micro-focused aspect of the individual parts themselves. It’s also about the human element of recording, and track bleed helps create a sound that has more of a human feel.
But it’s all very subtle. Realistically, track bleed is very much a non-issue. Honestly when all is finished, the listener is never going to know the vocal got on the piano track a little bit, and the drum mics also picked up the guitar. All that is a layer of production that really just creates a subconscious texture.
You would be surprised what you can get away with – across all genres, and in most situations.
If the individual tracks of your recording are the single bricks which make up the house, bleed is the mortar which holds the recording together.
It’s human, it’s real, it’s organic, and it’s warm. Take advantage of it.
I completely agree. Perhaps it is because I think I can discern the difference in a recording. I know I can tell the difference between vinyl and low-bit mp3s. Sadly, in general, the younger generation cannot.
This is an encouraging article disputing my claim:
Great article!
Bleed on my friend. Bleed on.